You made a statement. That “and Jesus never objected that Satan didn’t possess such a thing to offer.”.
Which is why I raise you: under this motive of a shrouded world order of demons—deceivers who have an intelligence differential higher than that of us, the deceived—why would the moon landing need to be “faked”? They could very easily make it happen and still achieve their motive, arguably in a more resounding way. They certainly have the knowledge to make the real thing happen (if they are truly demons) and they have the resources to pull it off (if they are truly behind every worldly world power). So why would they fake it, when that is an (arguably) objectively less elegant way to deceive? Are you suggesting that they just lied for schoolboy fun, or that they just didn’t have the actual knowledge to take mankind to space? Because note that nothing you’ve theorised falls apart if the moon landing is real. For instance, whether or not the world trade centre collapse was an intentional plan to justify the eventual shedding of innocent human blood, the reality is that the towers did collapse. People who saw it crumble, were not in limbo or high off psychedelics. Whether it happened by planes crashing into it or by previously embedded explosives, doesn’t really matter—the methodology is irrelevant to the overarching achievement of rousing the collective to sign off on engineered war. The real deception is beyond the deception of how they got it done, in such a case. So why does your premise of motive need the moon landings to have been faked, in order to be relevant? The moon landings could also for the sake of argument, be real, and still be for the purpose of achieving the motive you speak of. Most drugs do something—even if not heal you truly and albeit with a ton of life-debilitating side effects. So people are justified in taking them, inasmuch as those who don’t are justified in rejecting them. In such a case, it would even be more plausible to theorise that drugs are fake or are even synthesised poison slowly killing us all, putting in the same motive. But in this particular case of a faked moon landing, the question “why would they lie”, which seems to be the bane of most “conspiracies” unfortunately was not answered. “Why would they choose to want to go to the moon?” was answered resoundingly. “Why would they choose to conquer the skies?” makes sense. But “why would they lie?” still remains unanswered because your writing only addresses why they would WANT to lie (that is, why they would want you to believe they went to the moon), but not actually why they would, in fact, lie. Did they just really not know how to go to the moon for real? One would think that world powers capable of actually engineering a REAL moon landing to facilitate this overarching sinister godlessness you speak of, would be a more sure fire way to do it than by creating a hoax that can be debunked. So essentially I’m asking: are you saying satanic forces just don’t have the knowledge, or resources, or wherewithal, to actually go to the moon in order to justify an overarching lie?
It had to be faked because it's impossible. The reality of the world is not what you see in SF movies and NASA CGI, but that of the old religions: the Earth is a plane surrounded by an ice wall that further up encases the world as a dome where "celestial objects" move accordingly to a pattern. The center of the dome is Polaris, the fixed object dropping a straight line to the center of our world: The Pole. There's no "south pole".
And one can't pass through the dome or step foot on one of the "celestial objects".
Humans can't survive the radiation exposure of traveling to the Moon based on the tech that was used in 1969. For that reason, it is impossible that humans went there.
Exactly. Like he said, it wasn't that difficult for the Egyptians to track the movements of celestial bodies because they had the knowledge to do so. Similarly, the moon landing isn't just as difficult as people seem to think. It was expensive and required lots of human power, but it was 100% achievable. And it still is today.
No, it is not. Humans cannot survive the radiation exposure of traveling through the Van Allen radiation belt. I believe an unmanned lunar lander may be possible, but humans cannot survive the conditions needed to go to the moon based on the technology that was/is available.
It’s a small point really, but the Apollo mission planners did know about the Van Allen belt radiation and its potential danger to humans. That was summarized by Vernon Bailey in his article called "Radiation Protection and Instrumentation”, which was published in ‘Biomedical Results of Apollo’. You can see the citation in Wikipedia if you want. Discovery of the Van Allen belts was known before the Apollo missions were even conceived.
Even if they were aware, the effects of the radiation would be more much more prevalent and discussed than they are.
1. Astronauts in low orbit(with modern tech and more radiation protection) experience 'cosmic rays' which is radiation disrupting their vision. These symptoms would be experienced exponentially more in deeper space, passing through radiation belts, and on the moon. They are never mentioned.
2. Even if you dispute that humans would experience life-threatening amounts of radiation(which even many independent researchers are skeptical of NASA on), you cannot dispute the fact that the film cameras on the mission would have been entirely compromised by the radiation. You can't bring a normal roll of film through a TSA x-ray machine at the airport without corrupting the film. You even see signs warning you to not put it through the machine. The radiation on the moon(not to mention in the radiation belts) are 600x stronger than an x-ray machine.
How do you suppose that NASA took photos on the moon and brought them back on a film camera that was not encased on lead? Oh, and you can't find photos of the cameras used because they conveniently left them on the moon.
I can nod along with most of this (that the rich and powerful have sold their souls and become possessed by demons) but I don’t understand why they have to fake the moon landings - surely doing it for real has exactly the same payoff, without the potential downside of being found out. And are all the satellites, the ISS, the missions to Mars, Voyagers I and 2, the latest Indian rover on the moon fake too?
My exact thoughts. If these forces do have the resources to pull such a thing of (which they should if they are behind every worldly powerful government) and they are led by demons (who basically have exceedingly higher knowledge than we do), why not just go to the moon for real to enact this perpetual deception? He explains why they would WANT you to believe a moon landing, but not really why they would need to or want to fake it.
If demons are all-capable to pull this off, then why haven't we gone back with HD cameras? Why don't demons just set up a 4k video livestream from the moon so that it wouldn't have to even be questioned? Shouldn't they want to 100% prove, without an ounce of doubt, that 'scientists' are more powerful and all-knowing than God/the Bible?
Which is precisely what I did - I saw 6 satellites in a straight line at 6 am proceeding from SW to NE. And I can tell the difference between a satellite and an aeroplane.
It's odd that a mission to the moon would be named....Apollo. a Greek god of the sun. It's like they're telling you it's fake with that inverted name. Thanks for another excellent thought-inspiring post!
I am one of the few people to have gone to the moon and I have to say I find your unbelief is shocking! We risked our lives to go up thier walk around a bit do some science etc, just to have a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists throw dirt in our game. You all ought to be ashamed!
Some walloping, astronomically super sized questions raised here. When, how, how often and why does the government and corporate media fabricate elaborate deceptions? Is the gaslighting colossus (the Intelligence Establishment's "Mighty Wurlitzer?") the central, all-controlling arm of government?
If they weren't afraid to lie about all of the moon landings (just like they hadn't been afraid to televise the assassination of an American President, six years before the Apollo missions), what are the limitations, the constraints on their mendacity?
If you're calling them demonically evil forces, are you still partly allowing yourself to be deceived if you allow your critical thinking to be caged and roped off by the official boundaries and lies of the "Conspiracy Theory" Corral?
Insert video stills from any one of many of Geriatric Joe's televised appearances together with Grima Wormtongue speaking to diminished capacity King Theoden, in "The Two Towers." ("Lord of the Rings" film)
Who is whispering what into how many **Important** ears, and into how many hundreds of millions of ordinary, compliant and willing to go along ears?
And along the way, how many Slavs and Arabs will have to be sacrificed on the altar of Mars -- now owned outright with all television rights under license by the giant Shadow Bank private equity firms; BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Berkshire Hathaway -- before the White Dove, the Spirit of Peace is allowed into the Ukrainian and Gazan No Fly Zones?
Third, I can't even start to think about Three, yet, the last part of your essay, until I sleep on it and reread, tomorrow...
You made a statement. That “and Jesus never objected that Satan didn’t possess such a thing to offer.”.
Which is why I raise you: under this motive of a shrouded world order of demons—deceivers who have an intelligence differential higher than that of us, the deceived—why would the moon landing need to be “faked”? They could very easily make it happen and still achieve their motive, arguably in a more resounding way. They certainly have the knowledge to make the real thing happen (if they are truly demons) and they have the resources to pull it off (if they are truly behind every worldly world power). So why would they fake it, when that is an (arguably) objectively less elegant way to deceive? Are you suggesting that they just lied for schoolboy fun, or that they just didn’t have the actual knowledge to take mankind to space? Because note that nothing you’ve theorised falls apart if the moon landing is real. For instance, whether or not the world trade centre collapse was an intentional plan to justify the eventual shedding of innocent human blood, the reality is that the towers did collapse. People who saw it crumble, were not in limbo or high off psychedelics. Whether it happened by planes crashing into it or by previously embedded explosives, doesn’t really matter—the methodology is irrelevant to the overarching achievement of rousing the collective to sign off on engineered war. The real deception is beyond the deception of how they got it done, in such a case. So why does your premise of motive need the moon landings to have been faked, in order to be relevant? The moon landings could also for the sake of argument, be real, and still be for the purpose of achieving the motive you speak of. Most drugs do something—even if not heal you truly and albeit with a ton of life-debilitating side effects. So people are justified in taking them, inasmuch as those who don’t are justified in rejecting them. In such a case, it would even be more plausible to theorise that drugs are fake or are even synthesised poison slowly killing us all, putting in the same motive. But in this particular case of a faked moon landing, the question “why would they lie”, which seems to be the bane of most “conspiracies” unfortunately was not answered. “Why would they choose to want to go to the moon?” was answered resoundingly. “Why would they choose to conquer the skies?” makes sense. But “why would they lie?” still remains unanswered because your writing only addresses why they would WANT to lie (that is, why they would want you to believe they went to the moon), but not actually why they would, in fact, lie. Did they just really not know how to go to the moon for real? One would think that world powers capable of actually engineering a REAL moon landing to facilitate this overarching sinister godlessness you speak of, would be a more sure fire way to do it than by creating a hoax that can be debunked. So essentially I’m asking: are you saying satanic forces just don’t have the knowledge, or resources, or wherewithal, to actually go to the moon in order to justify an overarching lie?
It had to be faked because it's impossible. The reality of the world is not what you see in SF movies and NASA CGI, but that of the old religions: the Earth is a plane surrounded by an ice wall that further up encases the world as a dome where "celestial objects" move accordingly to a pattern. The center of the dome is Polaris, the fixed object dropping a straight line to the center of our world: The Pole. There's no "south pole".
And one can't pass through the dome or step foot on one of the "celestial objects".
Humans can't survive the radiation exposure of traveling to the Moon based on the tech that was used in 1969. For that reason, it is impossible that humans went there.
Exactly. Like he said, it wasn't that difficult for the Egyptians to track the movements of celestial bodies because they had the knowledge to do so. Similarly, the moon landing isn't just as difficult as people seem to think. It was expensive and required lots of human power, but it was 100% achievable. And it still is today.
No, it is not. Humans cannot survive the radiation exposure of traveling through the Van Allen radiation belt. I believe an unmanned lunar lander may be possible, but humans cannot survive the conditions needed to go to the moon based on the technology that was/is available.
It’s a small point really, but the Apollo mission planners did know about the Van Allen belt radiation and its potential danger to humans. That was summarized by Vernon Bailey in his article called "Radiation Protection and Instrumentation”, which was published in ‘Biomedical Results of Apollo’. You can see the citation in Wikipedia if you want. Discovery of the Van Allen belts was known before the Apollo missions were even conceived.
Even if they were aware, the effects of the radiation would be more much more prevalent and discussed than they are.
1. Astronauts in low orbit(with modern tech and more radiation protection) experience 'cosmic rays' which is radiation disrupting their vision. These symptoms would be experienced exponentially more in deeper space, passing through radiation belts, and on the moon. They are never mentioned.
2. Even if you dispute that humans would experience life-threatening amounts of radiation(which even many independent researchers are skeptical of NASA on), you cannot dispute the fact that the film cameras on the mission would have been entirely compromised by the radiation. You can't bring a normal roll of film through a TSA x-ray machine at the airport without corrupting the film. You even see signs warning you to not put it through the machine. The radiation on the moon(not to mention in the radiation belts) are 600x stronger than an x-ray machine.
How do you suppose that NASA took photos on the moon and brought them back on a film camera that was not encased on lead? Oh, and you can't find photos of the cameras used because they conveniently left them on the moon.
I can nod along with most of this (that the rich and powerful have sold their souls and become possessed by demons) but I don’t understand why they have to fake the moon landings - surely doing it for real has exactly the same payoff, without the potential downside of being found out. And are all the satellites, the ISS, the missions to Mars, Voyagers I and 2, the latest Indian rover on the moon fake too?
My exact thoughts. If these forces do have the resources to pull such a thing of (which they should if they are behind every worldly powerful government) and they are led by demons (who basically have exceedingly higher knowledge than we do), why not just go to the moon for real to enact this perpetual deception? He explains why they would WANT you to believe a moon landing, but not really why they would need to or want to fake it.
Why haven't we gone back then?
If demons are all-capable to pull this off, then why haven't we gone back with HD cameras? Why don't demons just set up a 4k video livestream from the moon so that it wouldn't have to even be questioned? Shouldn't they want to 100% prove, without an ounce of doubt, that 'scientists' are more powerful and all-knowing than God/the Bible?
Seriously, why haven't we gone back?
Yes. Why can't you Google a single photo/video of a satellite. Try it right now. All you will see are 3d generated images.
Please. I have a starlink connection. I actually saw half a dozen starlink satellites in the sky being positioned 2 years ago.
With my eyes, and 72 years of looking up at the night sky.
Do you think it is weird that no one has EVER taken a photo of a satellite from the ground?
My phone gets great data reception and I don't have Starlink. It is connected to a radio tower. That's how cell/data coverage works on this planet.
I'm sure you saw something in the sky. I see lights in the sky every night when a plane flies past. Doesn't mean it was a satellite train.
But you have never, and will never, see a photo/video of a satellite in orbit. You just won't. At a certain point, you need to trust your eyes.
Which is precisely what I did - I saw 6 satellites in a straight line at 6 am proceeding from SW to NE. And I can tell the difference between a satellite and an aeroplane.
Those things are so ugly...I hate not being able to look at the stars anymore without seeing a bunch of man made junk floating around.
I am not trying to belittle you, but how do you know it was a satellite? Have you seen one up close before?
How do you differentiate between a satellite, plane, or just light in the sky?
"all the arguments on either side have been beaten with a dead horse"
LOL - that image made me laugh. I've never heard it put that way before.
Why did Substack recommend this crock of shit feed to me??
It's odd that a mission to the moon would be named....Apollo. a Greek god of the sun. It's like they're telling you it's fake with that inverted name. Thanks for another excellent thought-inspiring post!
Wow! Interesting take I’ve not seen before. Keep writing!
I am one of the few people to have gone to the moon and I have to say I find your unbelief is shocking! We risked our lives to go up thier walk around a bit do some science etc, just to have a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists throw dirt in our game. You all ought to be ashamed!
.....and yeah, most drama people are slutty. 🎭💋
At least you've got the real enemy in your sights. "They" are the rulers of this world. Keep up the struggle Amigo, one day at a time......
First, thanks for the great, detailed
Moon Man, "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" link.
Interesting research and the Van Allen Belt is barely mentioned.
https://www.sibrel.com
Second:
Some walloping, astronomically super sized questions raised here. When, how, how often and why does the government and corporate media fabricate elaborate deceptions? Is the gaslighting colossus (the Intelligence Establishment's "Mighty Wurlitzer?") the central, all-controlling arm of government?
If they weren't afraid to lie about all of the moon landings (just like they hadn't been afraid to televise the assassination of an American President, six years before the Apollo missions), what are the limitations, the constraints on their mendacity?
If you're calling them demonically evil forces, are you still partly allowing yourself to be deceived if you allow your critical thinking to be caged and roped off by the official boundaries and lies of the "Conspiracy Theory" Corral?
Insert video stills from any one of many of Geriatric Joe's televised appearances together with Grima Wormtongue speaking to diminished capacity King Theoden, in "The Two Towers." ("Lord of the Rings" film)
Who is whispering what into how many **Important** ears, and into how many hundreds of millions of ordinary, compliant and willing to go along ears?
And along the way, how many Slavs and Arabs will have to be sacrificed on the altar of Mars -- now owned outright with all television rights under license by the giant Shadow Bank private equity firms; BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Berkshire Hathaway -- before the White Dove, the Spirit of Peace is allowed into the Ukrainian and Gazan No Fly Zones?
Third, I can't even start to think about Three, yet, the last part of your essay, until I sleep on it and reread, tomorrow...
But for now, thank you for another Good Read!