Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wisdom Deji-Folutile's avatar

You made a statement. That “and Jesus never objected that Satan didn’t possess such a thing to offer.”.

Which is why I raise you: under this motive of a shrouded world order of demons—deceivers who have an intelligence differential higher than that of us, the deceived—why would the moon landing need to be “faked”? They could very easily make it happen and still achieve their motive, arguably in a more resounding way. They certainly have the knowledge to make the real thing happen (if they are truly demons) and they have the resources to pull it off (if they are truly behind every worldly world power). So why would they fake it, when that is an (arguably) objectively less elegant way to deceive? Are you suggesting that they just lied for schoolboy fun, or that they just didn’t have the actual knowledge to take mankind to space? Because note that nothing you’ve theorised falls apart if the moon landing is real. For instance, whether or not the world trade centre collapse was an intentional plan to justify the eventual shedding of innocent human blood, the reality is that the towers did collapse. People who saw it crumble, were not in limbo or high off psychedelics. Whether it happened by planes crashing into it or by previously embedded explosives, doesn’t really matter—the methodology is irrelevant to the overarching achievement of rousing the collective to sign off on engineered war. The real deception is beyond the deception of how they got it done, in such a case. So why does your premise of motive need the moon landings to have been faked, in order to be relevant? The moon landings could also for the sake of argument, be real, and still be for the purpose of achieving the motive you speak of. Most drugs do something—even if not heal you truly and albeit with a ton of life-debilitating side effects. So people are justified in taking them, inasmuch as those who don’t are justified in rejecting them. In such a case, it would even be more plausible to theorise that drugs are fake or are even synthesised poison slowly killing us all, putting in the same motive. But in this particular case of a faked moon landing, the question “why would they lie”, which seems to be the bane of most “conspiracies” unfortunately was not answered. “Why would they choose to want to go to the moon?” was answered resoundingly. “Why would they choose to conquer the skies?” makes sense. But “why would they lie?” still remains unanswered because your writing only addresses why they would WANT to lie (that is, why they would want you to believe they went to the moon), but not actually why they would, in fact, lie. Did they just really not know how to go to the moon for real? One would think that world powers capable of actually engineering a REAL moon landing to facilitate this overarching sinister godlessness you speak of, would be a more sure fire way to do it than by creating a hoax that can be debunked. So essentially I’m asking: are you saying satanic forces just don’t have the knowledge, or resources, or wherewithal, to actually go to the moon in order to justify an overarching lie?

Expand full comment
David Simpson's avatar

I can nod along with most of this (that the rich and powerful have sold their souls and become possessed by demons) but I don’t understand why they have to fake the moon landings - surely doing it for real has exactly the same payoff, without the potential downside of being found out. And are all the satellites, the ISS, the missions to Mars, Voyagers I and 2, the latest Indian rover on the moon fake too?

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?