Discussion about this post

User's avatar
T Kermit's avatar

Thank you for this excellent essay. If I dare say so, there is a solution to this dilemma -- but a solution that opens up a host of other challenges. Nonetheless, it is a solution.

There are two main issues at play: the timing of Jesus' second coming and the nature of Jesus second coming.

First: As you have pointed out, there can be no honest dispute about the timing: it was expected, indeed promised, within the lifetime of Jesus's contemporaries. Unless one is willing to distort the plain meaning of words like "soon" and "this generation, all of the time references point to a first-generation fulfillment of the promise of his return. The failure of that promise is a deal breaker. If Jesus didn't return then I believe the entirety of the Christian enterprise is bogus. Others have (easily) recognized this. A major pillar in Bertrand Russell's (in)famous essay, Why I An Not a Christian, is Jesus' failure to return. Russell is not wrong.

Second: A thoughtful person must interrogate the NATURE of Jesus' coming. A proper understanding of the nature of the Christ's return that is rooted in Old Testament prophesies is the interpretive key that unlocks the box of understanding while, admitted, opening up other challenges. Nonetheless, those challenge are more surmountable than an outright failure of Jesus' promise. If one believes the nature of Christ's return is literally "in the clouds" -- i.e., a visible physical return of the embodied Jesus -- the, obviously, he failed. But if the nature of Jesus' return is consistent with God's other "comings" in judgment recorded in the Old Testament prophets, notably against Egypt and Babylon, then the problem gets easier to solve. Was there some kind of catastrophic judgment against Jerusalem within the lifetime of the disciples, a judgement that left not one stone of the temple standing upon the other? Yes, of course. The Jewish Civil War and the Roman conquest of Jerusalem in the seven-ish years encompassing the period around AD70 fits the bill in every respect that I have been able to find in my decades of study on this topic. Read J. Stuart Russell's The Parousia, R.C. Sproul's The Last Days According to Jesus, and many other books and websites now easily available. Just google: full preterist. (In fairness, Sproul, at the end of his life, thisclose to full preterism. He backed away and adopted partial preterism: Jesus would still return at some point and there were a few prophecies yet to be fulfilled) because of conflict with the creeds, all of which, of course, point to a return in OUR future. I say: the Creeds aren't infallible. Reform them if necessary.

In sum, believing that Jesus' promised return was fulfilled in the events around the fall of Jerusalem definitvely solves the timing problem. I can easily accept the nature of the coming as being one of judgment foretold in typical Old Testament apocalyptic language. Not a big leap at all. The questions that arise are legion:

A. Where are we now on God's historical, linear timeline? Feels like there's no end point to history.

B. You mean the resurrection of the dead, which is inseparable from Christ's return, ALREADY HAPPENED? Yep. It did. Then what about us?

C. If this is true how did the church miss it for 2,000 years? I dunno. How did the Jews miss their Messiah's arrival in Palestine 2,000 year ago? Large numbers of people have been wrong about all sorts of things over extended periods of time. Entire nations, civilizations! So, sure, the church could have "missed" Jesus' return.

I could go on, but here's where I've landed. If Jesus didn't return in AD70 as promised, his failure negates the entire enterprise. I believe he did return. Thus we can trust what he is recorded to have said about other matters, although his ministry was so tightly focused on his generation of Jews that much that he and the Apostles said and wrote ("don't get married!") are not applicable to us.

Perhaps this will stimulate thinking on the part of your readers. Adopting this perspective on the NATURE and TIMING of Jesus' return has certainly been lifechanging for me but has won me few friends in fundamentalist or evangelical circles when/if they discover that I'm a heretic. Generally I say nothing because most folks' minds are made up.

Jon's avatar

Preterists (partial or full) believe Jesus did “come back” in judgement on Israel in 70 A.D. within the lifetimes of his hearers and would say that he was employing apocalyptic language in the Olivet Discourse. Partial preterists affirm a final return of Christ at the end of history, but nevertheless believe that A.D. 70 was “a return”.

27 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?